320kbps vs FLAC? Brillis Wuce Jul 24. Get an MP3 and FLAC file of a tune you know well and do a blind. First I used mp3 320 Kbits as it was more compatible. 320 kbps 1 Link, Menudo -!!! Mega Taringa, Descargar Menudo -!!! CD Completo, Descargar Discografia Completa de. Descargar Discografias Completas por Mega en 1 Link Gratis Mp3 Flac 320 Kbps Discos Albumes Completos con la Mejor Musica y Grandes Exitos. You answered your own question: FLAC is lossless, which makes it technically better. The question is whether or not you will notice the difference between raw audio or FLAC and 192-320kbps MP3 and the only one who can answer that question is you. ![]() Going from 128kbps to 160kbps and 192kbps are quite noticeable improvements to me. Going further up to 224kbps is becoming far more subtle so when I encode stuff, I do not bother with more than 256kbps - one notch above the point where I can tell the difference. Unless you're investing in very good audio gear, AND probably have well-trained ears, you won't note any differences between 320k MP3 and FLAC. I'm assuming you're talking about downloading some files in those formats. Test it for yourself, with the gear you have. Download the FLAC and convert it to MP3, then listen to both. Heck, try multiple bitrates. With most pop/rock, 320k is probably overkill. Yeah that's what I'm about to do. But you bring up a good point. Mess around with them and see if I can tell. The ultimate answer is: it depends on your ears. I'm using some fair grade audio equipment, a pair of ath-m50's and a klipsch speaker system. I've always been able to tell the difference between low and high quality audio, however many higher grade headphones and speakers are less forgiving of low quality sources since you will spot the differences quite easily. Using my old earbuds and x530 or tv speakers even 96kbps was acceptable quality to me. Not great, but acceptable. After getting speakers and headphones at bare minimum i need 128kbps (for streaming radio) or i can not listen to it and 256kbps i consider the minimum for anything i own which sounds alright. I prefer either 320kbps or lossless but have alot of 256kbps as well. All of it is good. If you have the space for it, flac or other lossless formats are great, otherwise i'd stay at least 256kbps or above if you're using high end equipment. A lot depends on provenence. A lot of people get stuff on torrent sites etc. And sometimes it gets up graded (from 128 to 320 as a simple example). This won't make it better, it's still 128 shit. The point is, if you don't know the provenance of a file then you don't know where it's been, how it was made, what processes it's been through. Plainly speaking, a lot of what is found on Soul search etc. Is a lot of crap that even if it says 320kbm is often shite. The only way to be certain of bit rates and quality is to do it yourself or get from a trusted source. You're never gonna get vinyl or cd quality by downloading shit. In the end just listen. If it sounds shit then it is shit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2019
Categories |